Monday, May 02, 2005

Ken Tomlinson doesn't want you to know

The Center for Digital Democracy reported that Republican CPB board Chair Ken Tomlinson buried a study which found (against his expectations) that "the overwhelming majority of the U.S. public is happy with PBS and NPR programming."

Conducted between June 29-July 2003 and surveying 1,008 adults, the National Public Opinion Survey #2 showed that public broadcasting had an 80 percent “Favorable” rating; only 10 percent of those polled had an “Unfavorable” opinion of PBS and public radio. PBS "News & Information 'consumers'” were highly supportive of such programs as the "Newshour," "Frontline," "Morning Edition," and "All Things Considered."

More than half of those surveyed believed that PBS news and information programming was more “trustworthy” than news shows on the commercial networks, including ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, and CNN (while between 6 and 15 percent found PBS programming less trustworthy). Similarly, more than half of those surveyed believed that PBS provided more "in-depth" news and information programming than the networks (compared to between 17 and 24 percent who thought such programming was less in-depth). Only about 8 percent thought that PBS’s Iraq war coverage was “slanted.” More than a quarter of those surveyed said the reporting was “fair and balanced” (while 63 percent had “no opinion” at all). NPR received similar results. Few respondents believed that PBS and NPR “coverage of the Bush Administration” was “slanted” (a result that no doubt disappointed those at CPB who had formulated the question).

Finally, more than half (55 percent) said that PBS programming was “fair and balanced," with strong support for its “high quality programming” and as “a valuable cultural resource.” NPR received an even higher approval rating for its programming, including perceptions that it is “fair and balanced” (79 percent of respondents). There was also strong support for government funding of public broadcasting (with only 10 percent of those surveyed believing that the annual $1.30 per capita funding was "too much").

2 Comments:

At 5/03/2005 01:10:00 PM, Blogger The Author said...

Media Matter has more.

 
At 5/04/2005 06:41:00 AM, Blogger Schroeder said...

Rob, those are great links in the Media Matters story. Thanks.

I love the Tucker Carlson remarks - damn Republican brown-nosing tie-wearing dweeb.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home